Go Back   AFA Forums > Atheism > Call to action

Call to action Call out to atheist activism on polls, news articles, petitions or other injustice. Let everyone know we have a voice.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #451  
Old 11th December 2017, 06:23 PM
Darwinsbulldog's Avatar
Darwinsbulldog Darwinsbulldog is offline
AFA Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 18,408
Default Re: Marriage Equality is a Call to Action for the non-Religious

Quote:
stevebrooks said View Post
Point. I have no idea which particular Politicians electorates voted yes or no, unless it was brought up in wider media, used as a talking point or attack for instance, so apart from those who made a point, and that was what it was all about, I have no idea if any of the yes voters electorates voted no, or whether any of the no voters electorates voted yes. And you know, I have no interest in finding out!

One of the things I have always thought strange in politics is that the population at large are entitled to a secret ballot, but politicians have to put up their hands and say "yes it's me over here, I'm the homophobe" or vice versa, unless of course they want to make their positions clear and announce which way they are voting.

Now we also have to consider, those nine didn't have to leave the room to abstain! They could have sat there and just not voted, the leaving the room bit was theatrics, it was all about making a point knowing that they had no chance of getting their way and saying "this isn't finished."

So no, I am not going to criticise any yes voters whose electorates voted no, nor critcise any no voters whose electorates voted yes, but I am going to criticise those who used the vote to make a theatrical point, even if the only real point they made is that they aren't worthy of being our representatives!
It depends on what type of democracy one wants, I fear. There is no point in have a member that votes the way her/his electorate votes. The general population won't have access to all the facts, especially secret ones. What the rep is supposed to do is make an informed decision knowing all the facts, and the general sentiments of the electorate. Otherwise there is no point in having a rep, you could just practice direct democracy where everyone voted on policy and law.
__________________
Just stick to the idea that science tests falsifiable hypotheses to destruction.
Reply With Quote
Like wearestardust liked this post
  #452  
Old Yesterday, 10:13 AM
The Irreverent Mr Black's Avatar
The Irreverent Mr Black The Irreverent Mr Black is offline
An old banger, but almost unstoppable.
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toontown
Posts: 4,380
Default Re: Marriage Equality is a Call to Action for the non-Religious

How the electorates of the abstainers voted, just for the record.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg equal-abstainers.jpg (54.7 KB, 20 views)
__________________


Release the Socratic Questions!

Reply With Quote
  #453  
Old Yesterday, 01:34 PM
wearestardust's Avatar
wearestardust wearestardust is offline
What me socialist?
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: not telling
Posts: 8,492
Default Re: Marriage Equality is a Call to Action for the non-Religious

Quote:
The Irreverent Mr Black said View Post
@WAS: I did lie there briefly. last night, thinking of the new Member for Groom (narrowly NO), who voted YES.

Perhaps the nub of the thing is in its non-binding nature?

It seems to me that the non-binding nature of the matter relates to the inability of the Parliament to bind itself, ie a process and constitutional matter.


My issue is a moral one: relating to people who said "we must let the people decide this", and the people having decided, didn't follow through.


Thus, the commitments made by those who set the wretched thing up add an extra layer to the (somewhat irrelevant, I think) question of whether individual electorates voted this or that way.
__________________
If you need to wonder what would drive somebody to instruct lawyers, you may already be close to trouble.
- the Hircine Reverend
Reply With Quote
Like The Irreverent Mr Black liked this post
  #454  
Old Yesterday, 01:37 PM
wearestardust's Avatar
wearestardust wearestardust is offline
What me socialist?
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: not telling
Posts: 8,492
Default Re: Marriage Equality is a Call to Action for the non-Religious

Quote:
stevebrooks said View Post
Point. I have no idea which particular Politicians electorates voted yes or no, unless it was brought up in wider media, used as a talking point or attack for instance, so apart from those who made a point, and that was what it was all about, I have no idea if any of the yes voters electorates voted no, or whether any of the no voters electorates voted yes. And you know, I have no interest in finding out!

FWIW there were some western Syd ALP-held electorates that voted "no" but their members still voted 'yes'.


This (the no votes, not what the members did) led to a short flurry of attacks on immigrants and Muslims.

Quote:
One of the things I have always thought strange in politics is that the population at large are entitled to a secret ballot, but politicians have to put up their hands and say "yes it's me over here, I'm the homophobe" or vice versa, unless of course they want to make their positions clear and announce which way they are voting.

Secret ballots for voters are necessary to avoid pressure on voters. Conversely, politicians need to be accountable for the way they vote.
__________________
If you need to wonder what would drive somebody to instruct lawyers, you may already be close to trouble.
- the Hircine Reverend
Reply With Quote
Like Blue Lightning liked this post
  #455  
Old Yesterday, 01:42 PM
Stub King's Avatar
Stub King Stub King is offline
Take my advice, don't listen to me
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 842
Default Re: Marriage Equality is a Call to Action for the non-Religious

Quote:
Darwinsbulldog said View Post
It depends on what type of democracy one wants, I fear. There is no point in have a member that votes the way her/his electorate votes. The general population won't have access to all the facts, especially secret ones. What the rep is supposed to do is make an informed decision knowing all the facts, and the general sentiments of the electorate. Otherwise there is no point in having a rep, you could just practice direct democracy where everyone voted on policy and law.
in general I would agree. but on such occasions where we do go out and ask the public, I think it behooves reps to vote in accordance. they are elected and paid to represent their electorate, no matter what their personal views are. and on the rare occasion where the electorate actually gets to voice an opinion, they should represent that opinion.

Granted that there are certain freedoms MPs are entitled to, just like ordinary citizens. I don't think being an MP should exclude you from these entitlements. and without getting into a debate whether - for example - Abbott could vote 'no' under 'freedom of religion', I think that if I were in his electorate (or anyone else's for that matter), I would not look at his decisions favourably.
__________________
The less people know, the more stubbornly they know it. (Osho)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 12:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.