Go Back   AFA Forums > Science, Logic and Reason > Humanities/Social Sciences

Humanities/Social Sciences Philosophy, History, Politics etc

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 8th March 2017, 02:42 PM
Darwinsbulldog's Avatar
Darwinsbulldog Darwinsbulldog is offline
AFA Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 18,408
Thumbs up Social support networks and religiosity in rural South India [FREE]

Power, E. A. (2017). "Social support networks and religiosity in rural South India." Nature Human Behaviour 1: 0057.
Quote:
In recent years, scientists based in a variety of disciplines have attempted to explain the evolutionary origins of religious belief and practice1,​2,​3. Although they have focused on different aspects of the religious system, they consistently highlight the strong association between religiosity and prosocial behaviour (acts that benefit others). This association has been central to the argument that religious prosociality played an important role in the sociocultural florescence of our species4,​5,​6,​7. But empirical work evaluating the link between religion and prosociality has been somewhat mixed8,​9,​10,​11. Here, I use detailed, ethnographically informed data chronicling the religious practice and social support networks of the residents of two villages in South India to evaluate whether those who evince greater religiosity are more likely to undertake acts that benefit others. Exponential random graph models reveal that individuals who worship regularly and carry out greater and costlier public religious acts are more likely to provide others with support of all types. Those individuals are themselves better able to call on support, having a greater likelihood of reciprocal relationships. These results suggest that religious practice is taken as a signal of trustworthiness, generosity and prosociality, leading village residents to establish supportive, often reciprocal relationships with such individuals.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0057

http://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-017-0057.pdf

http://www.nature.com/article-assets...17-0057-s1.pdf

https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...0306114228.htm

__________________
Just stick to the idea that science tests falsifiable hypotheses to destruction.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 01:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.